Welcome to YEC Headquarters! Where God's word rules! Site best viewed in Internet explorer. The site works in other browsers, but some of the flash animations does not show up correctly.
New sections have gone up exposing evolution for what it really is. If you read just a few pages into each section, I guarantee you will never look at the theory of evolution in quite the same way again. Revealing the truth no matter how bad it is. If you don't think the hate of Hitler is being promoted through evolution, then read this evolution button that is sold on evolution-atheist sites:
Evolutionists, how do you eliminate people? You kill them correct? So here we actually see the evolutionist agenda. Why else would they sell and buy a button that says this? You will get several examples of this evolutionist agenda against Christians by clicking on shame part 3.
Shame part 1: Exposes evolutions true origins. And the evidence they still use that has been debunked and made fraudulent. Also how they ignore any evidence that does not support all the pillars of evolution. And how the lie of Ernst Haeckel introduced Hitler to evolution, which gave Hitler the excuse for what he did.
Shame part 2: Exposes how evolution has been used for religious bigotry. How teachers are fired in it's name. How students are made to conform or fail. And even denied passing grade, or recommendations, or even expelled. How science refuses to correct errors, and will make sure anyone who points them out gets fired.
Shame part 3: Exposes the extreme hate that evolutionist-atheist have for all Christians who will not conform to their views. You will see how they even make comments about killing us, wiping us off the face of the earth, using p*rn*graphy to destroy the Christian faith. Also see where Atheist-Evolutionists are promoting hate for "all" Christians over the radio. Yes, soon to come to a station near you. Hate the Christians, execute the Christians is what they are saying. The Hellbound Alleee Hitler radio network. Listen as they promote the same hatred for "all" Christians as Hitler did. Warning: this section is x-rated to show the truth of this type of hate brewing all over the Internet. What you read here will shock you, and you will never look at evolution in the same way again.
Side note to evolutionists who are offended by what is said here: Out of all the evolution sites, forums, and blogs I have read. I have yet to see one evolutionist condemn what I have put up on these pages from one of their own sites. Which means one of two things. 1) Either all evolutionists condone what is written on these websites. 2) They are to afraid to speak out about these sites because they know they will be rejected by their peers for doing so. And this is why you will see what you see here. You refuse to speak up about what was going on, on sites like this (FSTDT.com). So now you will see it listed on a creationist site.
Side note: It would seem that some from that site (FSTDT.com), are trying to say I altered something. Site is to sick to alter. Made me feel sick just putting up the info. I did censor one picture for it's explicit content. But if they want the full raw deal, I can put it back. It will just look worse for them.
Each section of this site is made like a book. When you read one webpage, you just click the next button at the bottom to continue. Most sections have a set of links on the first page to where you can skip forward in reading if you like. Some sections have several pages, others do not. And when you reach the end of one section, the next button at the bottom will not work. Which means there is nothing more to read.
If you are a frequent visitor to this site, we have a what's new section (link to the left) that shows any new info, or web pages. I try and keep it updated every two weeks.
Creation subject of the month:
Coelacanth, the 325 million year old fish?
Every so often, evolutionists gets caught up in one of their claims that they really had no evidence for. Evolutionists like to date extinct fossils to be real old. Why? Because as long as no one can find one alive, they can claim all kinds of stuff about it. How it evolved, it's evolution tree, etc... Problem is, when something is found alive that is believed to be extinct. It is never evolved past the point of how they found it fossilized (goes totally against evolution theory). The 325 million year old fish, that has not changed, has left evolutionist trying to figure out an excuse. What is the most common excuse for something that has not changed over 100's of millions of years?
It evolved to the point where it could survive, so it did not need to evolve further. Huh? Evolutionists were just claiming it was extinct, now that it's found they use a lame excuse to explain it away? Here's where it is claimed to be extinct:
When you take the fossil imprint from a rock, as you see above. And compare it to one that is living, as seen below....
You see here that the 325 million year old rock imprint...
Is not any different from a living coelacanth. Which means no evolution took place.
Then I took these two pics and super imposed one over the other to see if they were exactly the same fin. An exact match as seen above.
In case you are wondering why the super imposed picture looks funny. I had to take the living fin example (the black fin). And turn the pic side ways to align the bone in the middle. Anyone is welcome to copy those two pics and try this yourself. They match exactly, which means no evolution for 325 million years took place.
After 325 million years, this fish did not evolve one bit? Actually, this has left evolutionists scrambling for a answer.
The Coelacanth Would be the second fish from left to right. The scale above is the supposed scale of evolution of fish (water to land evolution). Problem is Coelacanth did not evolve as this scale would suggest. Which leaves the door open to the question: Did Evolution happen at all? The more living fossils that are found, the more it puts into question the evolution hypothesis that Darwin came up with.
But the only thing they can come up with is an excuse for this, as shown below.
Here's is another living creature that evolutionists make the same claim about when asked: How come this creature did not evolve any further? Their answer? Because it had evolved far enough to survive, it did not need to evolve further. Two totally different situations, both use the same lame excuse.
Coelacanth
Extinct but found alive.
Because it had evolved enough and did not need to evolve further..
Alligator
Not extinct, but primitive.
Because it had evolved enough and did not need to evolve further.
Sounds like more circular reasoning or denial of truth (Or both). For if they have to admit to why things were found this way, they would have to deny evolution and admit to being wrong. But evolutionists are never wrong on any issue. so that won't happen. Why? Evolution is another form of humanism. Humanism is self deification. Always being right, allows the humanist to exalt himself above those who he believes is wrong. Self exaltation requires that you lie to keep the position. Because to admit to something they despise to being right. Is like going from king position to peasant position.
Eternity has no beginning or end, and most would agree. But time always has to have a beginning and a end. This is also why God's word start out: In the beginning.... This was when time was created for us.
So if eternity cannot have time, why not?
1) Every second has a beginning and end. 2) Every minute has a beginning and end. 3) Every hour has a beginning and end. 4) Every day has a beginning and end. 5) Every week, month and year has a beginning and end.
Note: The above is what I used to believe. After doing more extensive study and research on this subject of time and eternity. I have come to a different conclusion on this. And it all started with this verse:
2pet 3:8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.
If eternity has no time, how do you compare time with something that has no time? And since the verse above does this, and also points out that eternity is a different time-line (1000 year vs. one day). It would mean that time does exist there, but it is not how we know it here.
2) Can you deny the literal word of God (including creation), and it not have an effect on your salvation?
If you can deny the truth of one part of the word of God, why not deny it all?
lk 16:29 Abraham saith unto him, They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them.
lk 16:31 And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead.
Moses wrote the book of Genesis. And therefore it is said that if one will not believe what Moses wrote, they more or less will not believe at all.
God's word says, if you break one commandment, you break them all. What was being demonstrated there? That committing one sin would have the same punishment as if you had committed them all. So calling one part of the word a myth or parable, when it is not stated to be such, is making the word into the truth that we want. Not what God has written.
The word parable is not even mentioned until this verse:
num 23:7 And he took up his parable, and said, Balak the king of Moab hath brought me from Aram, out of the mountains of the east, saying, Come, curse me Jacob, and come, defy Israel.
And never is the word "parable" ever related to creation. So those who are saying that the creation is not literal, are making the creation look and read like this.
Genesis 1:1 And God told this parable:In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
Some might get mad at me putting that there. But if we be true to what we want. There is a lot of people that would like a translation that says exactly that. And because this parable contains Adam and Eve. It makes their creation a parable, the first sin a parable. And everything that connects to this. Which by the way, includes salvation. Because there would be no need for salvation without the first sin.
Also, since Adam and Eve were the ones who started human kind. If they are a parable, because creation is a parable. Then all of the descendants of Adam and Eve automatically become parables. Which makes all of God's word a parable, which turns the whole thing into a myth, a lie. This is why evolutionists, atheist, agnostics, Old earth creationists, theistic evolutionists, etc... All attack the six day creation. Creation has to become myth in their mind before the rest of what they want to deny, can be denied. And if they can get others to do the same, they place seeds of doubt which grow, and faith can be lost. (link)
Truth becomes a matter of choice because of interpretations available. So we have these choices: 1) The literal word of God. 2) Man's natural interpretation of it.
And because of these choices, we have conflict. But what happens when we chose number two over number one? When number one wrote it? That is what the difference is between a literal choice, and a natural choice.
1) The literal choice you chose number one over number two. Which translates into God being your truth provider.
2) The natural choice makes number two over number one. Which translates to man being your truth provider. And that a outside source, such as evolution, being what is used to determine this.
Also, Can God's creation translate truth to it's Creator?
When Moses went to get the Ten Commandments. The people rebelled. This translates into the people wanting to translate truth to their Creator. And God, through Moses, gave them a choice. Those who continued to rebel, the ground opened up and swallowed them. Those who chose to obey the commandments, lived. Do you think this affected whether they went to heaven or hell? You only ascend when you go to heaven. You descend when you go to hell.
So is creation a salvation situation? Yes. Not that it's sends you to hell for believing it's not true. But it can put a person in danger of it. Only God makes the determination of whether what we do deserves such punishment.
Imagine this situation: When we stand before God, will God judge us by what is written, which includes the laws of God? Or will we be judged by natural means, which includes the laws of man?
So to sum it up:
When creation becomes a parable, so does all that was created. Adam and Eve were created by God. They committed the first sin. Deny just these two things, and the rest of God's word becomes a lie. How? Deny how the first sin was committed, you also deny why Christ died for our sins. Which makes the word of God not even usable.
The 6 day (Yom) argument:
1) What is the largest number mentioned in God's word? Believe it or not, it's a billion: gen 24:60 And they blessed Rebekah, and said unto her, Thou art our sister, be thou the mother of thousands of millions, and let thy seed possess the gate of those which hate them.
A thousand times a million equals one billion. So if we are speaking of thousands of millions, then several billion is what being referred to here. Why is this important? Many people think that God's word has no way of expressing a number beyond one million. But as I have shown here, there is a way to express several billion without actually using the word billion. This also shows since this expressing exists, that if this were meant for a day to be a time period beyond a 24 hour day. It would have been easy to do.
So we have the argument about the word Yom, and it's meaning. But let us apply this interpretation about yom not being a day to the rest of God's word:
1) When Christ died, did He rise on the third day, or the third time period?
2) When it rained for forty days, was it really forty time periods?
3) Just how long is a time period (Yom), or is it for each individual to say what they believe it is?
4) Why is a time period (yom) only questioned in Genesis one? But yet everywhere else, in God's word, considered a normal day?
So if it does not work with other parts of God's word. Why do we apply it to creation? It is because we want a certain subject to be true, and try and combine that with the word of God. Does changing the meaning of the word for what we want make a new truth just because we say so?
Changing the meaning of the word to suit temporal evidence means we are not willing to have faith in the unseen. And if we can't build our faith in the unseen, then how can we become more faithful to a God we cannot see?
If you would like a more in-depth explanation of the Yom vs. a 24 hour time period, click here.
Note for dial up users: So that you can see the movies at the speed they're made. At the end just click replay and what your browser has loaded already will replay movie at normal speed. This should work with all flash movies.
In order to view this site correctly, flash player is needed. It's free and you can download it here: Flash File size: 476k. Installs automatically into Explorer browser. To view animated gifs that are on this website. You must have JAVA plugin: Java plugin. There are quite a few flash movies on this website. Just click on some of the links to your left. Yec, E vs. C, OEC, Flood, and study all have flash movies. Click and enjoy.
